Introduction
It is common for
development pressure to emerge around a road construction project like this and
it is in the best interests of local units of government having jurisdiction in
these areas to plan for the orderly development of these areas. Eau Claire County and all other jurisdictions
in the county will begin working on a multi-jurisdictional comprehensive
planning project in the next couple of months that will include this area; the
towns of Seymour and Washington and the City of Altoona will directly
participate by preparing plans under the project and the City of Eau Claire
will be a cooperative partner. However,
with completion of the highway expected later this year, the Eau Claire County
Committee on Planning and Development concluded that it was necessary to
develop an up-to-date interim plan to guide development along this highway
corridor while comprehensive plans are being prepared. This report presents the interim plan for
this area.
Study Areas
This plan focuses on the segment of the USH 53 corridor
that lies within the Town of
The segment of the corridor lying in the Town of
In addition to the six
study areas describe above, the following area in
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS: Proposals for residential development in this
Study Area would be consistent with the Eau Claire County Land Use Plan. Residential development at a higher density,
with ½ acre lots without sewer and smaller lots with public sewer, would be
supported in the areas adjacent to
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS: Proposals for uses other than agricultural uses in the “Transitional” areas would be consistent with the Eau Claire County Farmland Preservation Plan. Proposals for development of uses other than agriculture in areas designated as “Agricultural Areas To Be Preserved” would not be consistent with this plan.
City of Eau Claire
Comprehensive Plans – According to the recently adopted City
of Eau Claire Comprehensive Plan, the land lying in the western half of Section
1 and the land lying in Section 2 on both sides of the US Highway 53 corridor
and lying north of the existing residential neighborhood along Woodhaven
Avenue, are designated as “Future Neighborhood, which are areas where “housing
and supportive commercial and non-residential development are expected to
occur”, where arrangements for development “will be determined through future
sub-area plans.” The existing
residential neighborhood along
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Proposals for a mixture
of housing types, with some commercial or other non-residential development
that would support the residential development, all serviced by public sewer,
would be consistent with the city’s plan for this Study Area. Proposals for commercial or other
non-residential development intended to serve the entire community would not
appear to be consistent with the plan.
Existing Land Use
– According to the Eau Claire County Land Use Inventory, most of the land in
Section 1 is in agricultural use and most of the land in Section 2 is in
residential use. Figure 5 provides an
illustration of the land use in the six study areas in
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: It appears that
continued agricultural use would be consistent with the existing land use
pattern in most of this study area, except for areas along
Topography and Soil
Conditions –The area is generally hilly with slopes
ranging from some relatively flat areas to slopes greater than 30%. Figure 6
shows the topography for the six study areas in
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Continued agricultural
use would be consistent with the existing soil conditions and topography on the
east side of the US Highway 53 corridor, except where steep slopes exist in the
study area. Most of the steep slopes in
this area are in excess of 20%, which are poorly suited for any type of
development. The area west of the US
Highway 53 corridor has areas with steep slopes in excess of 20% that are also
poorly suited for any type of development.
Areas without steep slopes have soils that are suitable for any type of
non-farm development.
Roads, Road
Conditions, and
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: All of the roads in the
study area except
Zoning
– The purpose of the Eau Claire County Zoning Ordinance includes, but is not
limited to, the following: to promote
public heath, safety, and comfort; to protect and conserve natural resources;
to protect and conserve the social character and economic stability and
preserve property values; and to encourage the use of land that is compatible
with nearby uses. Three zoning districts under the Eau Claire County Zoning
Ordinance are established in this area, including the A-1 Exclusive
Agricultural District, the A-2 Agriculture-Residential District, and the RH
Rural Homes District. Figure 9
illustrates the zoning for all study areas, except the Village of Lake
Hallie. The A-1 District supports
agricultural use on parcels that are at least 35 acres in size, and excludes
non-farm uses. The purpose of the A-1
District is to support farming and to exclude incompatible land uses. The A-2 District supports a mixture of hobby
farming and non-farm residential use on lots that are at least 5 acres in
size. The purpose of the A-2 District is
to provide locations for limited residential and hobby farm development and to
preserve natural resources and the county’s open space. The RH District supports residential
development on lots that are at least 1 acre in size. The purpose of the RH District is to provide
locations for suburban large lot residential development with onsite water and
septic systems. Most of the area on the east side of the USH 53 corridor has
zoning that will either support continued agricultural use (A-1)or a mixture of
hobby farms and non-farm residences on lots that are 5 acres or larger (A-2). Land straddling the north end of
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Continued agricultural
use in areas that are in the A-1 and A-2 District, would be consistent with the
zoning regulations. Non-farm residential
development on 5 acre or larger lots would also be consistent with zoning regulations
in areas in the A-2 District.
Residential development on 1 acre or larger lots would be consistent
with the zoning in the areas in the RH District. Any proposals for higher density residential
development or commercial development in this area would require rezoning.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS: Proposals for residential development in this study area would be consistent with the Eau Claire County Land Use Plan. Residential development at a much higher density would be consistent with this plan in the western 1/3 of this area, with ½ acre lots without sewer and smaller lots with public sewer; otherwise, residential development at a rural density would be consistent with the plan in the rest of this study area. It does not appear that proposals for other development, including commercial and industrial development, would be consistent with this plan.
Eau Claire County Farmland Preservation Plan – This
entire area is designated “Transitional” under the Farmland Preservation Plan,
which are areas where agricultural use was present when the plan was adopted in
1983, but were expected to convert to some other use within 10 to 20
years. Figure 3 provides an illustration
of the Farmland Preservation Plan for the six study areas in
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS: Proposals for uses other than agricultural uses in this entire area would be consistent with the Eau Claire County Farmland Preservation Plan, which designates the entire area as being “Transitional”.
City of Eau Claire
Comprehensive Plans – According to the recently adopted City
of Eau Claire Comprehensive Plan, all of the land lying in Sections 11 and 12
that are east of the US Highway 53 corridor are designated as “Future
Neighborhood, which are areas where “housing and supportive commercial and
non-residential development are expected to occur”, where arrangements for
development “will be determined through future sub-area plans”. There is also an area that is designated as a
future park location. The area west of
the US Highway 53 corridor, which is the southern end of the existing
residential neighborhood along
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Proposals for
residential development, with a mixture of housing types serviced by public
sewer, and proposals for some commercial or other non-residential development
on public sewer that would support the residential development, would be
consistent with the comprehensive plan for the City of
Existing Land Use –
According to the Eau Claire County Land Use Inventory, nearly all of the land
in this study area is in residential use.
Figure 5 provides an illustration of the land use in the six study areas
in
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Further residential
development on lots that are at least 1 acres in size would be consistent with
the existing land use pattern in Section 11.
Further residential development at a low density, consistent with 5 acre
lots or larger, would be consistent with the land use pattern in Section
12. Generally, it does not appear that
non-residential development would be consistent with the current land use
pattern in this area; however, some commercial development may be appropriate
if there is proper vehicular access and proper controls to address potential
nuisance factors such as lighting and noise.
Topography and Soil
Conditions – This area is characterized by being flatter,
with a subtle, undulating topography, with a couple of larger hills, as
illustrated in Figure 6. An area that is
approximately 30 acres in size has soils that are considered Prime Farmland
soils, otherwise, none of this study area has Prime Farmland soils. Soils in this area generally impose slight limitations
for on-site septic systems and shallow basement excavations, according to the
Eau Claire County Soil Survey. The soils
for study areas within
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Soils in this area are
not well suited for crop-cultivation. Soils generally have slight limitations
for non-farm development. Steep slopes in this area are in excess of 20%, which
are poorly suited for any type of development.
Roads, Road
Conditions, and Functional Road Classification
– The roads found in this study area include the following: Fuller Avenue, LaSalle Street, Burnell Drive,
Olson Drive/County Road Q, all running generally east and west; the southern
end of Woodhaven Avenue, Peterson Avenue, Werlien Avenue, St. Francis Drive W,
St. Francis Drive E, and N 60th Avenue, all generally running north
and south. According to the Metropolitan
Planning Organization (MPO) functional road map, Olson Drive/County Road Q and
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: All of the roads in the
study area except
Zoning
– The purpose of the Eau Claire County Zoning Ordinance includes, but is not
limited to, the following: to promote
public heath, safety, and comfort; to protect and conserve natural resources;
to protect and conserve the social character and economic stability and
preserve property values; and to encourage the use of land that is compatible
with nearby uses. Almost all of this area
is in the RH Rural Homes District under the Eau Claire County Zoning Ordinance,
which supports residential development on 1 acre lots with private septic
systems and wells. There is a mobile
home park which is in the R-3 Multiple Family Residential District. One parcel located in the northwest corner of
the intersection of
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Further residential
development on 1 acre lots would be consistent with the zoning in this
area. Commercial or other
non-residential development would not be consistent with the zoning in this
area.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS: Proposals for residential development at a high density, with ½ acre lots without sewer and smaller lots with public sewer, would be consistent with the Eau Claire County Land Use Plan. Proposals for commercial or non-residential development would not be consistent with this plan.
Eau Claire County Farmland Preservation Plan – Part
of Study Area 3 is included in a “Transitional” area under this plan, which are
areas where agricultural use was still present when the plan was adopted but were
expected to convert to some other use during the planning horizon, and the
remainder of the area is designated “Excluded”, which are areas that were
excluded from consideration in the plan because of existing development that
would prohibit agricultural use. Figure
3 provides an illustration of the Farmland Preservation Plan for the six study
areas in
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS: Proposals for uses other than agricultural uses in this entire area would be consistent with the Eau Claire County Farmland Preservation Plan.
City of Eau Claire
Comprehensive Plan – All
of the land that is still in the Town of Seymour lying on the east side of
Black Avenue is slated for medium to high density residential development in
the city’s comprehensive plan, which support residential development at a
density of more than 6 units per acre.
The same is true for a small area in the southeast corner of
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Proposals for
residential development serviced by public sewer would be consistent with the
comprehensive plan for the City of
Existing land use –
Land use in the Town of
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Further residential
development at an urban density on lots that are served by public sewer and
water would be consistent with the existing land use pattern in this area. In those areas where multiple family housing
has been developed, further high density residential development would be
appropriate. It does not appear that
non-residential development would be appropriate within this study area, based
upon the existing land use pattern.
Topography and Soil
Conditions –This study area is characterized by a rolling
topography with a ridge that State Road 124 has been cut through running along
the western side, as shown in Figure 6.
Most of the soils in this study area are not considered Prime Farmland
Soils, generally having slight limitations for basement excavations and septic
systems. The golf course that is located
in this study area has soils that are considered Prime Farmland soils by the
NRCS and local soil conservationists.
Figure 7 shows the soil types for study areas in
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Soils in this area are
not well suited for crop-cultivation, except where the golf course is located.
Soils generally have slight limitations for non-farm development. Steep slopes
in this area are in excess of 20%, which are poorly suited for any type of
development.
Roads, Road
Conditions, And Functional Road Classification
– Roads found in this study area include the following: State Road 124, Noble
Drive, LaSalle Street, Powell Street, Wildon Street, and Tweed Drive, all
running generally east and west; Noble Court, McKinley Road, Hawkins Street,
Gooder Street, Statz Avenue, Declaration Drive, E. Princeton Avenue, Princeton
Court, and the new US Highway 53 corridor, all running generally north and
south. According to the Metropolitan Planning
Organization (MPO) functional road map and the City of
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Most of the roads in
this study area are local roads that provide direct access to adjoining
property, and development consistent with land use and other policies should
continue to be allowed along these roads.
State Road 124 and USH 53 are arterials where access is limited to
intersections with collector or other arterial roads. No direct access should be provided from
these two roads. Development along
Zoning
– The purpose of the Eau Claire County Zoning Ordinance includes, but is not
limited to, the following: to promote public
heath, safety, and comfort; to protect and conserve natural resources; to
protect and conserve the social character and economic stability and preserve
property values; and to encourage the use of land that is compatible with
nearby uses. All of the land in the Town
of
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Further residential
development at an urban density would be consistent with the zoning regulations
in this study area.
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Proposals for
residential development to the east of
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS: Proposals for uses other than agricultural uses in this entire area would be consistent with the Eau Claire County Farmland Preservation Plan.
City of Eau Claire
comprehensive plan – Much of the land that lies east of the
USH 53 corridor is designated as a “Future Neighborhood” under the city’s
comprehensive plan, which are areas where “housing and supportive commercial
and non-residential development are expected to occur”, where arrangements for
development “will be determined through future sub-area plans”. The plan designates commercial development
for the land abutting the west side of
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Proposals for
residential development, with a mixture of housing types serviced by public
sewer, and proposals for some commercial or other non-residential development on
public sewer that would support the residential development, would be
consistent with the comprehensive plan for the City of Eau Claire for most of
the area east of USH 53 in this study area.
Proposals for all types of commercial development would be consistent
with the plan on the west side of
Existing land use –
Most of the area east of
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Further residential
development would be consistent with the existing land use pattern in most of
this study area, except for land along
Topography and Soil
Conditions – The majority of this area is gently sloped,
as illustrated in Figure 6. There are no
Prime Farmland soils in this study area.
Soils generally have slight limitations for basement excavations and
septic systems, except where there are steep slopes. Figure 7 shows the soil types for the six
study areas in
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Soil conditions will
support any type of non-farm development in this area, except where there are
steep slopes, which should be protected from development.
Roads, Road
Conditions, And
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Most of the roads in
this study area are local roads that provide direct access to adjoining
property, and development consistent with land use and other policies should
continue to be allowed along these roads.
Tower Drive, and
Zoning
– The purpose of the Eau Claire County Zoning Ordinance includes, but is not
limited to, the following: to promote
public heath, safety, and comfort; to protect and conserve natural resources;
to protect and conserve the social character and economic stability and
preserve property values; and to encourage the use of land that is compatible
with nearby uses. There are several
zoning districts established in this area under the Eau Claire County Zoning
Ordinance as follows: RH Rural Homes
District, which supports residential development on 1 acre lots with private
septic systems and wells; R-1-L Single Family Residential District, Large Lot,
which supports residential development where public sewer is available or will
soon be available, on 12,000 square foot lots with public sewer or 20,000 square
foot lots without sewer; C-2 General Business District, which supports most
retail commercial businesses on 8,000 square foot lots or larger without public
sewer service; and I-1 Nonsewered
Industrial District, which supports industrial development that does not
require municipal sewer and water services.
The lower density RH District is found between
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Further residential
development in areas in the R-1-L and RH District, and commercial development
in areas in the C-2 District, would be consistent with the zoning in this
area. It appears that consideration
should be given to rezoning the residences along
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Further residential
development of this area would be consistent with the county’s Land Use
Plan. Non-residential development would
be inconsistent with the plan.
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Proposals for uses
other than agricultural uses in this entire area would be consistent with the
Eau Claire County Farmland Preservation Plan.
City of
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Further residential
development would be consistent with the city’s plan for this area, including
some multiple-family housing.
Non-residential development would not appear to be consistent with the
plan.
Existing land use –
Land use in the Town of
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Further single-family
residential development at an urban density on lots that are served by public
sewer and water would be consistent with the existing land use pattern in this
area. Multiple family housing may be
appropriate near
Topography and Soil
Conditions – Except for a hilly swath that crosses
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Soil conditions will
support any type of non-farm development in this area, except where there are
steep slopes, which should be protected from development.
Roads, Road
Conditions, And Functional Road Classification
– Both Regional Planning and the city’s comprehensive plan designate McKinley
Road as a collector road, although the road has not been improved with wider
shoulders like most collector roads.
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS:
Zoning
– The purpose of the Eau Claire County Zoning Ordinance includes, but is not
limited to, the following: to promote
public heath, safety, and comfort; to protect and conserve natural resources;
to protect and conserve the social character and economic stability and
preserve property values; and to encourage the use of land that is compatible
with nearby uses. The R-1-L Single
Family Residential District, Large Lot, is the only zoning district applicable
to this area under the Eau Claire County Zoning Ordinance. This zoning district supports residential
development where public sewer is available or will soon be available on 12,000
square foot lots, and residential development on 20,000 square foot lots
without sewer. The zoning districts
established within the Town of
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Further residential
development on 12,000 square foot lots with sewer, or 20,000 square foot lots
without sewer, would be consistent with the zoning in this area.
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Further residential
development of this area would be consistent with the county’s Land Use
Plan. Non-residential development would
be inconsistent with the plan.
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Proposals for uses
other than agricultural uses in this entire area would be consistent with the
Eau Claire County Farmland Preservation Plan.
City of Eau Claire
Comprehensive Plan – All of the land that lies east of the USH
53 corridor is designated as a “Future Neighborhood” under the city’s
comprehensive plan, which are areas where “housing and supportive commercial
and non-residential development are expected to occur”, where arrangements for development
“will be determined through future sub-area plans”. The land on the west side of the USH 53 corridor is designated for Low
Density Housing which supports housing at a density of 2.5 to 6 dwelling units
per acre. The comprehensive plan specifies
that all of these areas must be served by public sewer and water services when
annexed into the city. Figure 4 provides
an illustration of the City of
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS: Proposals for residential development
serviced by public sewer, with a mixture of housing types including
multiple-family housing, and proposals for some commercial or other
non-residential development on public sewer that would support the residential
development, would be consistent with the comprehensive plan for the City of
Eau Claire for the area east of USH 53 in this study area. Low Density single-family housing would be
consistent with the city’s plan for the land on the west side of the USH 53
corridor under this plan.
Existing land use –
Most of the land use in the Town of
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Proposals for further
residential development in this area would be consistent with the existing land
use pattern.
Topography and Soil
Conditions – Most of this area is relatively flat, except
for a ravine on the east side of the USH 53 corridor, and a hill located west
of McKinley Road/County Road Q, as show in Figure 6. There are no prime agricultural soils in this
study area, the majority of soils being sandy or sandy-loam. Figure 7 shows the soil types in this area
and Figure 8 lists the soils that are considered Prime Farmland Soils.
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Soils in this area are
not well suited for cultivation. Soils generally have slight limitations for
non-farm development. There are some steep slopes in this area in excess of
20%, which are unsuitable for any type of development.
Roads, Road Conditions,
And Functional Road Classification – The MPO’s
functional road map and the City of Eau Claire’s Comprehensive Plan designate
Tower Avenue and North Shore Drive as collector roads, and the short segment of
McKinley Road found in this Study Area as a minor arterial. All other roads are classified as local
roads. All roads and their
classifications in the six study areas in
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Most of the roads in
this study area are local roads that provide direct access to adjoining
property, and development consistent with land use and other policies should
continue to be allowed along these roads.
Tower Drive and North Shore Drive/County QQ are collector roads;
ideally, further development along these roads should take access from internal
local roads that connect with these roads.
Zoning
– The purpose of the Eau Claire County Zoning Ordinance includes, but is not
limited to, the following: to promote
public heath, safety, and comfort; to protect and conserve natural resources;
to protect and conserve the social character and economic stability and
preserve property values; and to encourage the use of land that is compatible
with nearby uses. Most of this area
falls under the R-1-L Single Family Residential District, Large Lot. This zoning district supports residential
development where public sewer is available or will soon be available on 12,000
square foot lots, and residential development on 20,000 square foot lots
without sewer. One parcel of land within
this area is RH Rural Homes District, which supports residential development on
1 acre lots with private septic systems and wells. Two parcels in the southeast corner of the
intersection of North Shore Drive/County Road QQ and Indian Hills Drive are in
the C-2 General Business District, which supports most retail commercial businesses
on 8,000 square foot lots or larger without public sewer service. The zoning
for this area is shown in Figure 10.
ANALYSIS
AND CONCLUSIONS: Any further residential
development in this area would be consistent with the existing zoning
regulations. Higher density development
would be acceptable provided public sewer and water services are provided. Rezoning the property that is currently zoned
for commercial use to the R-1-L District would also be acceptable.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS: Proposals for light industrial development along the west side of USH 53 would be consistent with the Village TID #1. The area on the east side of USH 53 that is within about ¼ mile of the interchange at Melby Street and USH 53 would also be suitable for light industrial use according to the Project Plan for this TID, although the Village would find a mixture of highway commercial and residential acceptable. Further residential development within approximately ¼ mile and 1/3 mile of the east side of USH 53 would also be consistent with the TID. Continued agricultural use in the easternmost portion of the TID would be consistent with the Project Plan for the TID.
Existing Land Use – Figure 13 classifies the
existing land use within TID #1 as either vacant, residential, or
commercial. Most of the land is
considered vacant. A substantial part of
the land that is considered vacant has been in agricultural use, primarily for
row crops or in tree plantations. Since
this map was produced, a considerable amount of development has already been
completed in the southwest corner of the interchange between the USH 53
corridor and County Road OO, including a “big-box” retail store (Wal-Mart), a
restaurant (Culvers), and another commercial building. The remaining land on the west side of USH 53
is vacant. Much of the land abutting the
TID is in commercial use, and there are also some residential subdivisions that
abut this area. There are a number of
single-family residences along
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS: It appears that further low-density residential development would be consistent with the existing land use pattern on the east side of USH 53 along the existing roads in this area, and agricultural or open-space use would be consistent with the existing land use in the rest of this area. Continued agricultural use appears to be an appropriate interim land use for the land on the west side of USH 53, and further highway commercial use would be consistent with the development that has begun in this area. New road improvements in this area would support commercial use in this location. It appears that light industrial use would also be acceptable, provided any light industrial or commercial use in this area is adequately buffered from the existing residential neighborhoods.
Topography And Soil Conditions – Most of this area is relatively flat with a couple of small hills and several wetland areas. There are some areas that have steep slopes in excess of 20%. Most of the soils on the west side of USH 53 are not considered Prime Farmland. Soils in this area have moderate limitations for non-farm development; most soils are considered poor filters for conventional septic system drain fields because soils are either too sandy or too wet. There is an extensive area on the east side of USH 53 that has soils considered Prime Farmland. Figure 14 show the soil types in this area and Figure 15 lists the soils that are considered Prime Farmland Soils.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS: Continued agricultural use would be consistent with the existing soil conditions and topography on the east side of the US Highway 53 corridor, except where steep slopes exist. Most of the steep slopes in this area are in excess of 20%, which are poorly suited for any type of development. The area west of the US Highway 53 corridor is relatively flat and there are some moderate limitations to development. The moderate limitations to development can be overcome with proper engineering and other techniques.
Roads, Road Conditions, And
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS: USH 53 is a limited access principal
arterial, and therefore no direct access is permitted along this road. The four lane road constructed on the west
side of USH 53 is intended to accommodate traffic associated with commercial
and industrial development that is planned for this area, and should serve this
purpose satisfactorily. The two land
road constructed to connect N 50th Avenue in the Town of Seymour in
Eau Claire County with 125th Street in the Village of Lake Hallie in
Chippewa County establishes a frontage road on the east side of USH 53 which is
122nd Street. This road is
suitable for providing direct access to adjoining properties. It appears that improvements to this road
would be necessary to accommodate any extensive light industrial or commercial
development in the vicinity of the
Zoning – Figure 12 shows the zoning that has been
established within TID #1. The purpose
of the zoning regulations in the Village of Lake Hallie parallels the purpose
of the Eau Claire County Zoning Ordinance.
As noted earlier under the Project Plan for TID #1, a substantial part
of the TID that abuts USH 53 has been zoned for industrial use, including the
area on the southeast side of the USH 53 interchange with
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS: The industrial and commercial zoning
districts that have been established in the Village of Lake Hallie along the
border with the Town of